Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0828620060100020141
Journal of Korean Arthroscopy Society
2006 Volume.10 No. 2 p.141 ~ p.147
Comparion of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using Hamstring Tendon Autograft and Tibialis Tendon Allograft
Song Eun Kyoo

Seon Jong-Keun
Park Sang-Jin
Bae Bong-Hyun
Kim Jong-Seon
Lee Dam-Seon
Abstract
Purpose:To compare the clinical and radiological results of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft and tibialis tendon allograft.

Materials and Methods:Twenty four ACL reconstructions using hamstring autograft and 30 using tibialis anterior tendon allograft were followed up at least 1 year. We performed femoral tunnel fixation with Ligament Anchor(LA) screw and tibial tunnel fixation with biodegradable interference screw. Evaluations included Lysholm knee(LK) score, Tegner activity scale, Lachman test, Pivot-Shift test, Quardriceps atrophy, incision site numbness, anterior knee pain and instrumented anterior laxity with Telos¢ç device.

Results:Preoperativ mean LK score was 60.3(18~82) in autograft group and 61.2(25-80) in allograft group. Mean LK score improved to 91.6(68~100) and 92.6(77~100) respectively. Activity level, using Tegner activity scale, slightly decreased compared with that of preinjury state in both groups. Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Quadriceps atrophy, anterior knee pain, incision site numbness, and anterior drawer test using Telos¢ç device showed no significant difference between two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions:In performing the ACL reconstruction, there was no statistically significant difference between hamstring autograft group and tibilis anterior allograft group in clinical or in radiological results.
KEYWORD
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions, Hamstring autograft, Tibialis anterior allograft
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information